USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities
Prepared by Vicki Blazer, U.S. Geological Survey
(Released October 2012) (PDF Version)
Introduction

As the largest and most productive estuary in North America, Chesapeake Bay is a vital ecological and economic resource. The bay and its watershed have been degraded, however, by poor water quality, loss of habitat, and overharvesting. The Chesapeake Bay Program, a cooperative program among several Federal and State agencies, is working to restore fish and wildlife in the bay watershed and the habitats and water quality on which they depend. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides the science that is needed to improve the understanding and management of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.
Fish skin lesions and fish kills have occurred in Chesapeake Bay and its watershed for many years. In some cases, specific pathogens or environmental factors (low dissolved-oxygen concentrations, rapid temperature changes, chemical spills) have been associated with these events. Often, however, the causes of fish mortality are not well understood. In 2002, many smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) and other freshwater fishes died in the South Branch Potomac River. In subsequent years, similar mortality occurred in the North Fork (2004) and South Fork (2005) of the Shenandoah River and in the Monocacy River (2009) (see fig. 1). These events primarily affected adult fishes during the spring and early summer.
Factors That Affect the Health of Aquatic Ecosystems
Although pathogens and parasites are an inherent and natural component of ecosystems, overt disease and mortality are generally considered indicators of degraded systems. The emergence of infections may be linked to environmental changes such as (1) poor water quality (overabundance of nutrients, sediment, and toxic contaminants); (2) degrading stream habitats (caused by changes in flow and temperature, for example); (3) introduction of non-native species; and (4) altered food webs. The complex interactions among these stressors and the sublethal effects of complex mixtures of chemicals are poorly understood. For example, exposure to atrazine, a commonly detected herbicide in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, has been shown to increase the susceptibility of silver catfish to Aeromonas hydrophila (this bacterium or other motile Aeromonads were cultured from diseased bass) at sublethal concentrations (Kreutz and others, 2010), and is also associated with increased trematode (a type of parasite commonly found in the tissues of bass) infections in some amphibians (Rohr and others, 2008). Arsenic (used in pesticides, used as an additive in poultry feed, and found naturally) has been reported to modulate the immune response of fishes (Hermann and Kim, 2005; Lage and others, 2006) and is also associated with skin lesions in humans (Kazi and others, 2009). Additionally, exposure to arsenic was shown to enhance the ability of A. hydrophila to colonize and disseminate within exposed catfish (Datta and others, 2009) and inhibit the ability of zebra danio to clear viral or bacterial infections (Nayak and others, 2007).
USGS Studies of Fish Health in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
The USGS and its cooperators are monitoring the biological effects of contaminants on fishes, identifying parasites and pathogens involved in lesions and mortalities, and working to determine the causes of poor fish health and kills in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. This Science Summary is one in a series that is designed to facilitate the understanding and application of results of relevant USGS studies by Chesapeake Bay resource managers and policy makers. It provides a brief overview of the most recent published work by the USGS and collaborators on fish kills and fish lesions in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, an understanding of how this information can be used to develop effective management policies and practices, and a list of references for additional information.
The KEY FINDINGS and the IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES AND NEXT STEPS listed below are from Alvarez and others (2008; 2009), Iwanowicz and Ottinger (2009), Robertson and others (2009), Blazer and others (2010), and Walsh and others (2012).
Key Findings
Figure 2. Gross lesions observed on fish collected from the Chesapeake Bay watershed prior to and during fish kills: (A) Raised mucoid areas found to be papillomas; (B) small raised, reddened areas; (C) large red, raised lesions; (D) erosions with pale necrotic tissue; (E) erosions of skin and muscle; and (F) pale areas covered with fungal hyphae (modified from Blazer and others, 2010). View figure in larger size PDF. |
Figure 3. Microscopic observations in tissues of fishes collected from the Chesapeake Bay watershed during mortality events: (A) Foci of bacterial microcolonies (indicated with arrows) typical of Aeromonas salmonicida systemic infections in the spleen tissue of redbreast sunfish and (B) spleen tissue of smallmouth bass with many encysted trematode metacercariae (indicated with an "a") (modified from Blazer and others, 2010). View figure in larger size PDF. |
Figure 4. Concentrations of arsenic in tissues of smallmouth bass collected from the South Fork Shenandoah River watershed in spring 2009 (modified from Blazer and others, 2010). Concentrations were measured in multiple tissues collected in March, April, and May; data are shown as mean ± standard error. View figure in larger size PDF. |
Figure 5. Microscopic observations of gill tissue with myxozoan parasites in smallmouth bass collected from the Chesapeake Bay watershed: (A) Heavily infected gill with numerous plasmodia of Myxobolus branchiarum (indicated with an "a") and (B) mixed infection of M. branchiarum (indicated with an "a") and M. micropterii (indicated with a "b") (modified from Walsh and others, 2012). View figure in larger size PDF. |
Implications for Management Policies and Practices and Next Steps
References Cited
Alvarez, D.A., Cranor, W.L., Perkins, S.D., Schroeder, V., Iwanowicz, L.R., Clark, R.C., Guy, C.P., Pinkney, A.E., and Blazer, V.S., 2009, Reproductive health of bass in the Potomac, USA, drainage: Part 2. Seasonal occurrence of persistent and emerging organic contaminants: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, v. 28, no. 5, p. 1,084–1,095, DOI: 10.1897/08-417.1. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1897/08-417.1/abstract;jsessionid=0E539383A22FE136D70F8719580C83C9.d03t04)
Alvarez, D.A., Cranor, W.L., Perkins, S.D., Schroeder, V.L., Werner, S.L., Furlong, E.T., and Holmes, John, 2008, Investigations of organic chemicals potentially responsible for mortality and intersex in fish of the North Fork of the Shenandoah River, Virginia, during spring of 2007: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1093, 16 p. (also available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1093/).
Blazer, V.S., Iwanowicz, L.R., Starliper, C.E., Iwanowicz, D.D., Barbash, P., Hedrick, J.D., Reeser, S.J., Mullican, J.E., Zaugg, S.D., Burkhardt, M.R., and Kelble, J., 2010, Mortality of centrarchid fishes in the Potomac drainage: Survey results and overview of potential contributing factors: Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, v. 22, no. 3, p. 190–218. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21192549)
Datta, S., Ghosh, D., Saha, D.R., Bhattacharya, S., and Mazumder, S., 2009, Chronic exposure to low concentrations of arsenic is immunotoxic to fish: Role of head kidney macrophages as biomarkers of arsenic toxicity to Clarias batrachus: Aquatic Toxicology, v. 92, no. 2, p. 86–94. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19237206?ordinalpos=360&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum)
Hermann, A.C., and Kim, C.H., 2005, Effects of arsenic on zebrafish innate immune system: Marine Biotechnology, v. 7, no. 5, p. 494–505. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16007375)
Iwanowicz, L.R., and Ottinger, C.A., 2009, Estrogens, estrogen receptors and their role as immunoregulators in fish, in Zaccone, G., Meseguer, J., Garcia-Ayala, A., and Kapoor, B.G., eds., Fish defenses, Volume 1—Immunology: Enfield, New Hampshire, Science Publishers, p. 277–322. (http://isbndb.com/d/book/fish_defenses_vol_1_immunology.html)
Kazi, T.G., Arain, M.B., Baig, J.A., Jamali, M.K., Afridi, H.I., Jalbani, N., Sarfraz, R.A., Shah, A.Q., and Niaz, A., 2009, The correlation of arsenic levels in drinking water with the biological samples of skin disorders: Science of the Total Environment, v. 407, no. 3, p. 1,019–1,026. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19027142)
Kreutz, L.C., Barcellos, L.J., Marteninghe, A., Dos Santos, E.D., and Zanatta, R., 2010, Exposure to sublethal concentration of glyphosate or atrazine-based herbicides alters the phagocytic function and increases the susceptibility of silver catfish fingerlings (Rhamdia quelen) to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge: Fish and Shellfish Immunology, v. 29, no. 4, p. 694–697. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20685618)
Lage, C.R., Nayak, Akshata, and Kim, C.H., 2006, Arsenic ecotoxicology and innate immunity: Integrative and Comparative Biology, v. 46, no. 6, p. 1,040–1,054 (also available online at http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/content/46/6/1040.full)
Nayak, A.S., Lage, C.R., and Kim, C.H., 2007, Effects of low concentrations of arsenic on the innate immune system of the zebrafish (Danio rerio): Toxicological Sciences, v. 98, no. 1, p.118–124 (also available online at http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/1/118.full).
Robertson, L.S., Iwanowicz, L.R., and Marranca, J.M., 2009, Identification of centrarchid hepcidins and evidence the 17beta-estradiol disrupts constitutive expression of hepcidin-1 and inducible expression of hepcidin-2 in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides): Fish and Shellfish Immunology, v. 26, no. 6, p. 898–907. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19376234)
Rohr, J.R., Schotthoefer, A.M., Raffel, T.R., Carrick, H.J., Halstead, N., Hoverman, J.T., Johnson, C.M., Johnson, L.B., Lieske, C., Piwoni, M.D., Schoff, P.K., and Beasley, V.R., 2008, Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species: Nature, v. 455, p. 1,235–1,239. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972018)
Walsh, H.L., Iwanowicz, L.R., Glenney, G.W., Iwanowicz, D.D., and Blazer, V.S., 2012, Description of two new gill myxozoans from smallmouth (Micropterus dolomieu) and largemouth (Micropterus salmoides) bass: Journal of Parasitology, v. 98, no. 2, p. 415–422. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22060822)
For additional information, contact Vicki Blazer (vblazer@usgs.gov, 304-724-4434) or Scott Phillips (swphilli@usgs.gov, 443-498-5552).