USGS - science for a changing world

USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities




U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Science Summary—USGS develops novel approach to assess efficiency of stormwater management practices

(Released August 2017) (PDF Version)
Figure 1 A, B, C, D

Figure 1. Photographs showing example best management practices (BMPs) in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Maryland: (A) bioretention cell; (B) detention pond; (c) sand filter; (D) grass swale. Photographs by Kristina Hopkins, U.S. Geological Survey.

Issue

Urban stormwater runoff is a rapidly increasing source of pollutants to Chesapeake Bay. It contributes on average 16 percent of the nitrogen, 16 percent of the phosphorus, and 25 percent of the sediment load to the bay annually. Urban stormwater best management practices (BMPs) (fig. 1) have been used in an effort to reduce the volume and improve the quality of stormwater runoff entering streams in the bay watershed and, ultimately, the bay. Traditional BMP design focuses primarily on flood control and spatially centralized stormwater treatment; however, this approach increases pollutant loads to streams during storm events, bypassing opportunities for pollutant removal on the landscape.

More recently, BMPs have been implemented in a low impact development (LID) manner to treat stormwater runoff nearer to its source. LID BMP design aims to maintain natural areas, promote infiltration, and improve water quality. LID BMPs are commonly implemented in networks, or treatment trains (a series of connected BMPs), to provide spatially distributed stormwater treatment and more closely reproduce the volume and rate of runoff in an undeveloped landscape.

The USGS developed a novel BMP model to quantify and compare the pollutant removal efficiencies on a watershed scale in two urban watersheds in Maryland with different BMP spatial design patterns (traditional and LID). An estimate of uncertainty was included in the modeling framework by using ranges for BMP pollutant removal efficiencies that were compiled from previously published studies. The results are in the journal article "Modeling watershed-scale impacts of stormwater management with traditional versus low impact development design" (Sparkman and others, 2017).

Key Findings

For the two watersheds studied, simulation results show that the LID watershed removed pollutants more effectively than the traditional watershed. Results of the model show that the BMPs in the LID watershed removed approximately an additional—

per square kilometer per year (a 7-, 5-, and 29-percent increase in mean total pollutant load removed, respectively) compared to the BMPs in the traditional watershed (table 1, fig. 2).

Table 1. Predicted average nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment removal in a traditional and a low impact development (LID) watershed in Maryland.

[kg/yr, kilograms per year; kg/km2/yr, kilograms per square kilometer per year; s.d., standard deviation; %, percent]

 

Pollutant
Nitrogen

Phosphorus Sediment
Traditional LID Traditional LID Traditional LID

Watershed pollutant load (kg/yr)

3,379

1,308

152

59

17,255

6,679

Mean watershed pollutant load removal (kg/yr)

849

422

59

26

9,198

5,471

Total watershed pollutant load removal
(kg/km2/yr)

274
s.d.=25

352
s.d=36

19
s.d.=1.2

22
s.d.=0.6

2,967
s.d.=201

4,559
s.d.=36

Simulated total watershed pollutant load removal range (kg/km2/yr)

199–338

228–456

16–23

20–23

2,483–3,403

4,418–4,668

Mean total pollutant load removed (%)

25

32

39

44

53

82

Implications for Management Policies and Practices and Next Steps

Source of Information

The USGS findings described in this Science Summary are available by accessing the document below, which should be used as the reference for this information:

Sparkman, S.A., Hogan, D.M., Hopkins, K.G., and Loperfido, J.V., 2017, Modeling watershed-scale impacts of stormwater management with traditional versus low impact development design: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12559.

For Additional Information

Visit the U.S. Geological Survey Eastern Geographic Science Center web page “Description of current projects—Urban green infrastructure for stormwater management” at https://egsc.usgs.gov/PDS_BMP.html, or contact Stephanie Sparkman, U.S. Geological Survey, at ssparkman@usgs.gov.


Figure 2 A
Figure 2 B
Figure 2 C

Figure 2. Frequency distribution plots showing annual predicted removal of (A) nitrogen, (B) phosphorus, and (C) sediment in two watersheds in Maryland with different best management practice (BMP) designs—traditional and low impact development (LID). (kg/km2, kilograms per square kilometer)

Figure 3
Figure 3 Legend/Explanaion

Figure 3. Example images from a geographic information system (GIS) illustrating storm-sewer infrastructure and best management practice (BMP) locations, connectivity, and drainage areas for the low impact development (LID) study site, Maryland, on a watershed scale.



Home  |  Contact Us  |   USGS Chesapeake Intranet

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://chesapeake.usgs.gov/sciencesummary-smallwatershedreport.html
Page Contact Information: Web Administrator
Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 04-Jan-2017 09:52:14 EST